JEC Group have brought together the international community of composites leaders and executives in our Composites Circle as an unique networking opportunity to meet with both peers and future partners.
This paper presents a production sequence for a demonstrator of the main landing gear bay for a single-aisle aircraft. The sequence uses efficient, highly automated sequential processes that include prepreg UD tape, automatic tape laying, hot forming, SQRTM and phasedarray ultrasonic inspection for the rapid one-shot manufacture of integrated structures. SQRTM is an RTM process adapted to prepreg technology, combining the ad-vantages of RTM with the improved mechanical properties of prepreg UD tape. These processes reduce the assembly steps and the associated costs and results in lighter, better-performing parts.
By CEDRIC DE ROOVER, Project Management / BERTRAND VANEGHEM, Technologies and New Products Development, SABCA(Published on January-February 2011 – JEC Magazine #62)
The existing manufacturing cycle for complex structures is presented in Figure 1.The first stage of the manufacturing cycle covers the fabrication and inspection of all individual parts. The second stage encompasses assembly and final inspection steps. The part can be mechanically assembled using fasteners or bonded (cobonding or secondary bonding) with the possible need for an additional autoclave cycle.
The means of automation are(1) ply cuttingand lay-up using an automatic tape layer, (2) laminate forming with a hot forming system, (3) trimming with CNC machines, (4)inspection with automatic A- or C-scan equipment, (5) mechanical assembly with robots. In the existing process, the remaining difficulties are two materialintensive,time-consuming operations: the automation of laminate placement in the curing mould and the vacuum bagging step. These steps could be improved using a closed-mould process such as RTM adapted to prepreg technology (SQRTM). With this process, cocuring is maximized and a complex structure can be produced in a single cure cycle. Steps such as laminate placement in the curing moulds, part demoulding and tool cleaning also offer automation opportunities (Figure 2).The SQRTM processSQRTM is an RTM process adapted to prepreg technology. The prepreg is placed in a closed mould and during the cure cycle, a small amount of resin is injected into the cavity through ports positioned around the part to establish hydrostatic pressure on the prepreg . The tool can either be self-clamped and self-heated or heated by a press. The equipment is composed of an injector and a vacuum pump (Figure 3).The vacuum pump is connected to the mould and to the piston during the resin degassing step. Being a key process parameter, temperature is controlled in the piston, on the piston head, in the injection line and inside the tool. The pressure inside the mould is controlled by the piston. The SQRTM curing cycle, shown in Figure 3, is similar to the standard autoclave curing cycle.
The advantages are the use of qualified prepregs – toughened resins, UD reinforcements, a high level of integration, and tight tolerances  – and surface finish according to the moulding process. Disadvantages are a higher tool price and a lower level of flexibility to design changes.Cost reduction The left pie chart in Figure 4 shows an example of recurring cost distribution for a complex structure assembled with a standard autoclave process. Cost drivers are materials, clean-room activities (including hot forming, bagging, demoulding and mould cleaning) and final assembly.
Using the SQRTM process results in:
- the elimination or reduced number of fasteners,- the reduced amount of tape with thinner junction parts and - a significantly reduced amount of process materials, vacuum bagging step,
On the other hand, the inspection could be more complex and time consuming due to highly integrated parts. The objective of the SQRTM process is to cut recurring costs by about 20%. This level of cost reduction quickly offsets the higher tooling costs, even for small manufacturing batches. The next stage consists in introducing robots in the process to significantly reduce lay-up, clean-room and inspection activities.RTM process automation can be transferred to SQRTM technology. Laminate placement in the curing mould,demoulding, mould and mandrel cleaning are potential newchallenges when robotizing the SQRTM process. The nextobjective of using robots is to reduce recurring costs by about 40%,based on constant material prices.
Demonstrator for the main landing gear bay of asingle-aisle aircraft
Figure 5 shows the SQRTM demonstrator, which combines themain structural concepts of the rear bulkhead and pressure floor ofa main landing gear bay. It is composed of two beams with localreinforcements and variable sections (up to 9-mm thick), a rib and a stiffened panel with 7 hollow omega stringers. All the parts are made out of prepreg UD tape (HS carbon/epoxy).
The process steps are the same as those presented in Figure 2,without using robots. After the flat lay-up of laminates with theautomatic tape layer and hot forming with dedicated equipment(single or double diaphragm), the wet laminates are transferredinto the closed mould. The curing mould is placed in the heatingpress. After curing, the part is demoulded and inspected (Figure 6).The demonstrator was designed taking into consideration theenvironmental conditions and the manufacturing sequence. Rightfrom the beginning of the development phase, the concept has toconsider the use of prepreg combined with hot forming and closedmouldtechnologies. This implies a geometric definition enablingforming of laminates and an adequate and efficient assemblysequence of curing-mould mandrels. A comparison with a similar structure whose parts are curedseparately in an autoclave and fastened after individual inspectioncould give a weight reduction of around 10%. The reasons are: nofoam for the stringers, no local reinforcements for bearingcapabilities and use of UD tape instead of fabric.ConclusionThe automated sequential process based on SQRTM technologypresented here reduces assembly steps and the associated costs andresults in lighter, better-performing parts. The key benefits are theautomated manufacturing of integrated structures allowing theproduction of parts with higher mechanical properties due toprepreg UD products, tighter tolerances and surface finishaccording to the moulding process. Future investigations will focuson greater automation in combination with fibre placement.
References K. Mason, High-Performance Composites, Autoclave qualityoutside the autoclave, March 2006. H. P. J. de Vries, Development of generic composite boxstructures with prepreg preforms and RTM, NLR-TP-2002-019,National Aerospace Laboratory NLR, Amsterdam, January 2002. B. Morey, Manufacturing Engineering, Processes reduce costs,Vol. 138 No 4, April 2007. H. G. S. J. Thuis, Development of a composite cargo door for anaircraft, NLRTP- 99434, National Aerospace Laboratory NLR,Amsterdam, October 1999..
Here are few examples and update of these two techniques which can be seen in many application sectors now.